Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||The influence of the introduction of self assessment on compliance behaviour of individual taxpayers in Malaysia|
|Authors:||Loo, Ern Chen|
Mixed method design
|Publisher:||University of Sydney.|
|Abstract:||Self assessment for individual taxpayers was first introduced in Malaysia for the 2004 year of assessment. This change from the previous official assessment system to self assessment has redefined the roles and responsibilities of both taxpayers and tax administrators in Malaysia. In particular, self assessment has placed the onus on individual taxpayers, both salary and wage earners and the self-employed, to voluntarily and correctly determine their own tax liabilities. The level of voluntary compliance achieved under self assessment was expected to be influenced not only by taxpayers’ ability to understand the compliance requirements of the income tax law, but also by their behaviour in relation to a range of economic, fiscal, psychological and sociological factors. In this context, the main objective of this research was to investigate the influence of the introduction of self assessment on the compliance behaviour of individual taxpayers in Malaysia. In addition, the research sought to identify the causes (such as ‘tax knowledge’, ‘tax structure features’, ‘financial constraints’ and ‘attitudes towards tax’) that may influence taxpayers’ compliance behaviour; and the nature of their influence, in relation to the introduction of self assessment in Malaysia. Demographic variables (such as age, gender, level of education and ethnic background) were also investigated to provide another dimension (as moderating variables) to the analysis of compliance behaviour. Six research questions were developed to address the objectives of the research. A mixed method design comprising two quantitative research methods (survey and experiment) and one qualitative research method (case study) was conducted concurrently in three phases. The findings derived were triangulated via a cross-method analysis to address the six research questions. The findings revealed that the introduction of self assessment had had a positive influence on individual taxpayers’ compliance behaviour. This was attributed to individual taxpayers having a greater awareness of the change in their responsibilities as a result of self assessment, and that this in turn led to an improvement in their tax knowledge. As there was no prior comparable empirical evidence available in relation to the impact of the introduction of self assessment on tax compliance behaviour, this research finding is an important contribution to existing knowledge on the compliance behaviour of individual taxpayers. Based on the findings of the research, it was found that tax knowledge had significant effects on the compliance behaviour of individual taxpayers. The lack of tax knowledge did cause numerous errors in tax returns prepared and furnished by individual taxpayers, resulting in unintentional non-compliance by some and over compliance by others. Tax structure features showed reasonably strong effects on taxpayers’ compliance behaviour. Empirical evidence revealed that fear of being tax audited and penalised had also indirectly influenced individual taxpayers’ compliance decisions. Thus it is concluded that individual taxpayers were sensitive to the two tax structure features, namely tax audit and penalty, while the effect of the tax rates on their compliance behaviour was marginally less significant. Financial constraints were found to have more direct and strong influence on the compliance behaviour of self-employed taxpayers. The issue of financial constraints was not of major concern among the salary and wage earners under the self assessment regime. However, as the tax rates imposed on individual taxpayers in Malaysia are relatively low as compared to some other countries (such as those in Australia and New Zealand), and coupled with relief and rebates available, individual taxpayers could be paying very minimal taxes. In terms of attitudes towards tax, two prominent findings emerged from the survey and the case study. Firstly, taxpayers’ attitudes, in terms of confidence in handling their tax affairs, did have a positive impact on their compliance behaviour. Secondly, taxpayers’ attitudes towards the tax system, the tax administration and tax officers had negative effects on their compliance decisions. In contrast to the effects of financial constraints, these findings on attitudes towards tax appeared to be only affecting the compliance behaviour of individuals who were salary and wage earners. Finally, in the multi-ethnic society of Malaysia, this research revealed evidence of the different needs of ethnic groups in relation to tax education, how they manage their tax affairs, how the tax structure features as well as how their attitudes towards tax had affected their decision to comply. This research also revealed evidence of the different compliance behaviour of the two categories of taxpayers (i.e. the salary and wage earners and the self-employed) in respect of the reporting compliance pertaining to three different types of income (i.e. taxable income, exempted income and casual income). Arising from the findings of this research, several policy implications were identified. The findings demonstrated that in formulating strategies to enhance voluntary compliance, it is important for the relevant authorities to be aware of, understand and appreciate individual taxpayers’ compliance behaviour and the need to render tax education services.|
|Description:||Doctor of Philosophy|
|Rights and Permissions:||The author retains copyright of this thesis.|
|Type of Work:||PhD Doctorate|
|Appears in Collections:||Sydney Digital Theses (Open Access)|
This work is protected by Copyright. All rights reserved. Access to this work is provided for the purposes of personal research and study. Except where permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, this work must not be copied or communicated to others without the express permission of the copyright owner. Use the persistent URI in this record to enable others to access this work.
Show full item record
Items in Sydney eScholarship Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Abutalebi, J., & Green, D. W. (2008). Control mechanisms in bilingual language production: Neural evidence from language switching studies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 557–582.
Akhtar, N., & Menjivar, J. A. (2012). Cognitive and linguistic correlates of early exposure to more than one language. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 42, 41–78.
Ardila, A., Rosselli, M., Matute, E., & Guajardo, S. (2005). The influence of the parents’ educational level on the development of executive functions. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 539–560.
Association of Muslim Professionals (AMP). (2012). Demographic study on Singapore Malays. http://www.amp.org.sg/edisi/data/Publications/3rd%20Convention%20Journal/Section%209%20-%20Demographic%20Study.pdf (retrieved October 7, 2013).
Barac, R., & Bialystok, E. (2012). Bilingual effects on cognitive and linguistic development: Role of language, cultural background, and education. Child Development, 83, 413–422.
Bialystok, E. (1999). Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development, 70, 636–644.
Bialystok, E., & Barac, R. (2012). Emerging bilingualism: Dissociating advantages for metalinguistic awareness and executive control. Cognition, 122, 67–73.
Bialystok, E., & Martin, M. (2004). Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: Evidence from the dimensional change card sort task. Developmental Science, 7, 325–339.
Bialystok, E., & Viswanathan, M. (2009). Components of executive control with advantages for bilingual children in two cultures. Cognition, 112, 494–500.
Blume, M., Yang, S., & Lust, B. (2014). Virtual Linguistics Lab Child Multilingualism Questionnaire. Ms., Cornell University.
Bokhorst-Heng, W. (1998). Language planning and management in Singapore. In Foley, J. A., Kandiah, Bao Zhiming, T., Gupta, A. F., Alsagoff, L., Lick, Ho Chee, Wee, L., Talib, I. S. & Bokhorst-Heng, W. (eds.), English in new cultural contexts: Reflections from Singapore, pp. 287–309. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bradley, R. H. (1994). The HOME Inventory: Review and reﬂections. In Reese, H. (eds.), Advances in child development and behavior, pp. 241–288. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371–399.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1999). Environments in developmental perspective: Theoretical and operational models. In Friedman, S. L. & Wachs, T. D. (eds.), Measuring environment across the life span: Emerging methods and concepts, pp. 3–28. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
Carlson, S., & Meltzoff, A. (2008). Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental Science, 11, 282–298.
Cavallaro, F., & Serwe, S. K. (2010). Language use and language shift among Malays in Singapore. Applied Linguistics Review, 1, 129–170.
Costa, A., Hernández, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2008). Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106, 59–86.
Department of Statistics (2010). Census of Population 2010 Statistical Release 1: Demographic characteristics, education, language and religion. Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade and Industry. http://internet-stg2.singstat.gov.sg/publications/publications_and_papers/cop2010/census_2010_release1/cop2010sr1.pdf (retrieved October 20, 2013).
Department of Statistics (2013). Singapore in figures. Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade and Industry. http://internet-stg2.singstat.gov.sg/statistics/latest_data.html#16 (retrieved October 20, 2013).
Dixon, L.Q. (2003). The bilingual education policy in Singapore: Implications for second language acquisition. In J. Cohen, K. T. McAlister, K. Rolstad & J. MacSwan (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism, pp. 625–635. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. L., & Dunn, D. M. (2006). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Fourth Edition examiner's manual and norms booklet. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Engel de Abreu, P. M. J., Cruz-Santos, A., Martin, R., & Bialystok, E. (2012). Bilingualism enriches the poor. Psychological Science, 23, 1364–1371.
Ensminger, M. E., & Fothergill, K. (2003). A decade of measuring SES: What it tells us and where to go from here. In Bornstein, M. H. & Bradley, R. H. (eds.), Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development (Monographs in Parenting Series), pp. 13–27. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347.
Foley, J. A. (1998). Code-switching and learning among young children in Singapore. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 130, 129–150.
Gathercole, V. C. M., Thomas, E. M., Jones, L., Guasch, N. V., Young, N., & Hughes, E. K. (2010). Cognitive effects of bilingualism: Digging deeper for the contributions of language dominance, linguistic knowledge, socio-economic status and cognitive abilities. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13, 617–664.
Hilchey, M. D., & Klein, R. M. (2011). Are there bilin-gual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Imp-lications for the plasticity of executive control pro-cesses. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 18, 625–658.
Hughes, C., & Ensor, R. (2005). Executive function and theory of mind in 2 year olds: A family affair?Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 645–668.
Kang, C. K. (2009). Tracing the etiology of discrepancies: When socioeconomic and literacy effects are considered in the bilingual advantage of executive attention. Honors thesis, Singapore Management University.
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test – Second Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc.
Kovács, A., & Mehler, J. (2009). Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 6556–6560.
Leimgruber, J. R. E. (2013). Singapore English: Structure, variation, and usage (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, C., Koyasu, M., Oh, S., Ogawa, A., Short, B., & Huang, Z. (2009). Culture, executive function, and social understanding. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development, 123, 69–85.
Lipina, S. J., Martelli, M. I., Vuelta, B., & Colombo, J. A. (2005). Performance on the A-not-B task of Argentinean infants from unsatisfied and satisfied basic needs homes. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 39, 49–60.
Mezzacappa, E. (2004). Alerting, orienting, and executive attention: Developmental properties and sociodemographic correlates in an epidemiological sample of young, urban children. Child Development, 75, 1373–1386.
Mcloyd, V. C. (1998). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American Psychologist, 53, 185–204.
Morton, J. P., & Harper, S. N. (2007). What did Simon say? Revisiting the bilingual advantage. Developmental Science, 10, 719–726.
Mutalib, H. (2005). Singapore Muslims: The quest for identity in a modern city-state. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 25, 53–72.
Mutalib, H. (2011). The Singapore minority dilemma. Asian Survey, 51, 1156–1171.
Noble, K. G., Norman, M. F., & Farah, M. J. (2005). The neurocognitive correlates of a socioeconomic status in kindergarten children. Developmental Science, 8, 74–87.
Noble, K. G., McCandliss, B. D., & Farah, M. J. (2007). Socioeconomic background predicts individual differences in neurocognitive abilities. Developmental Science, 10, 464–480.
Oh, S., & Lewis, C. (2008). Korean preschoolers’ advanced inhibitory control and its relation to other executive skills and mental state understanding. Child Development, 79, 80–99.
Paap, K. R., & Greenberg, Z. I. (2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 66, 232–258.
Patterson, J. L. (2002). Relationships of expressive vocabulary to frequency of reading and television experience among bilingual toddlers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 493–508.
Posner, M. I., & Fan, J. (2004). Attention as an organ system. In Pomerantz, J. & Crair, Michael C. (eds.), Topics in integrative neuroscience: From cells to cognition, pp. 31–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention systems of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42.
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 1–23.
Rueda, M. R., Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Halparin, J. D., Gruber, D. B., Lercari, L. P., & Posner, M. I. (2004). Development of attentional networks in childhood. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1029–1040.
Rueda, M. R., Rothbart, M. K., McCandliss, B. D., Saccomanno, L., & Posner, M. I. (2005). Training, maturation, and genetic influences on the development of executive attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 14931–14936.
Sabbagh, M. A., Xu, F., Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Lee, K. (2006). The development of executive functioning and theory of mind: A comparison of Chinese and U.S. preschoolers. Psychological Science, 17, 74–80.
Stroud, C. (2007). Multilingualism in ex-colonial countries. In Auer, P. & Wei, Li (eds.), Handbook of multilingualism and multilingual communication, 509–538. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tobin, J. J., Wu, D. Y. H., & Davidson, D. H. (1989). Preschool in three cultures. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1978). Methods of modeling capacity in simple processing systems. In Castellan, J. & Restle, F. (eds.), Cognitive theory (vol. III), pp. 200–239. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Videsott, G., Della Rosa, P. A., Wiater, W., Franceschini, R., & Abutalebi, J. (2012). How does linguistic competence enhance cognitive functions in children? A study in multilingual children with different linguistic competences. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 884–895.
White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481.
Yang, S., Yang, H., & Lust, B. (2011). Early childhood bilingualism leads to advances in executive attention: Dissociating culture and language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 412–422.
Yim, O., & Bialystok, E. (2012). Degree of conversational code-switching enhances verbal task switching in Cantonese–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 873–883.